Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquaport

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  08:37, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aquaport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not yet notable DGG ( talk ) 11:58, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:03, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:03, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Amusement Parks-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 18:06, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buidhe 04:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not like the article can't be recreated if and when it is. We shouldn't keep articles for currently none notable subjects around just because we anticipate it will become notable in the future. Plus, for all you know the project could be delayed. Also, undoubtedly there will be some time between it's opening and the publication about it in reliable sources. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.